West Ham Rumours

 

Use our rumours form to send us west ham transfer rumours.


Paypal single or recurring donation

(single word yields best result)
 
Ed046 is placing football tips on our Bets site
27 Oct 2020 09:57:18

Most of the posts go to the West Ham Banter page.

22 Oct 2020 11:46:29
So I’ve been reading that Moyse’s new “dilemma” is the match day 18 v City.

Haller has recovered from a knock and with Benrahma must been included.

If all fit, Moyse is likely to start the same XI.

So who misses out?

It seems odd that you need to officially submit your squad (up to 25) for the season, but only name 18 for match day.

Is there any reason why it’s limited to 18?

Why can’t subs be chosen from your full squad?

Eds? Is it just tradition?

{Ed002's Note - Until the mid 60s there were no subs allowed. Then you could name one and then it went to two, three and then five. Recently, to finish last season, it was expanded but the Premier League clubs voted against it for this season when it was offered up - the argument being that it would favour those sides with stronger squads (typically the higher-profile sides). However, what I do expect to happen moving forward is (a) a push to lower the maximum number on non Home Grown players from 17 to perhaps 12 or 13, (b) an increase in the number of "Club Developed" (having been with the club for a year before turning 19) players which currently only impacts UEFA competition, and (eventually) (c) changing to matchday squad such that a minimum number of Home Grown players must start the game (say four), and a minimum number of Club Developed players (say four again) need to be in the match day squad. There are already rules surrounding this in other countries.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

22 Oct 2020 16:32:46
Thx for the info.

Agree0 Disagree0

23 Oct 2020 08:10:12
Markro, yes very difficult section for DM after recent gutsy performances? For me Haller doesn’t warrant any selection anywhere, maybe controversial to say so to some punters, but his contributions have been nil for me!

Whether he will start Benhrama against City or not is difficult, but I think it will be Fornals who starts but will be the one to be replaced either way which will be unfortunate, unless he is having a atinker! Some may possibly say Snoddy should make way on the bench, but he always grafts and makes some contribution, certainly Yarmo must be in there to call on? ⚒⚒⚒⚒.

Agree0 Disagree0

23 Oct 2020 17:51:02
All decent points (except about Haller 😂) .

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Oct 2020 08:33:24
Markro, sorry mate😂🤣Can’t get my head around when it when I feel he cannot adapt up front and at least look as if he is putting some effort and enthusiasm into a game, I cannot accept a whole team system should be changed to suit one player! Enough of Haller🤣Really looking To the 12.30 KO, again really interesting now the whole team is really pulling together and grafting for each other! Just hope no niggling injury problems especially arguably against one of the Worlds best teams! ⚒⚒⚒⚒⚒.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Oct 2020 09:58:58
i too don't think Haller is good enough to disrupt a team that is pulling together. He has a lot of talent and is a decent footballer but he doesn't do enough work, i can't see him making the subs bench let alone starting a game.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Oct 2020 11:45:05
Haller I think is a good player, but a good player that doesn't at all fit into moyes system, a system that has been doing well in last 3 games can't see at all how he fits in except as sub in last 15 mins.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Oct 2020 11:50:25
Just seen the line up no Benrahma anywhere🤔⚒⚒⚒ Bideford our favourite Haller is on the bench🤣Markro and a few others will be pleased Haller is there! ⚒⚒.

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Oct 2020 02:24:35
Also that great forward OZIL scored 33 goals in 184 apps at 0.18 per game and your slagging HALLER off yeah right no wonder you tried the assists stat ed your so transparent I can nearly see you what a great charity giver that OZIL was. COYI.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Oct 2020 10:32:29
Phil Jones in January anyone?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

20 Oct 2020 11:31:41
There’s a lot games between now n Jan.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Oct 2020 11:37:46
Nope, to clumsy and erratic for me, if his on a free and willing to pay as you play but for every yellow card or foul conceded he gets fined, it would be a sensible move as well be in credit after each match.

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Oct 2020 11:51:03
I’ve seen that we would have to pay £20m for him, no chance, we can do better than that.

Agree1 Disagree0

21 Oct 2020 13:25:04
Left out of PL squad too -- clearly a reason he's been (r) ejected.

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Oct 2020 19:15:41
Ed’s. given that premier league squads have now been submitted, does that mean free agents would need to wait until January before they could make a premier league appearance (if they were signed), or could they be added to the premier league squad if there is space?

{Ed002's Note - If there is space in the squad it is possible to add free agents at any time (assuming they were free agents at some point during the last transfer window.) So West Ham could sign and play Samir Nasri if they have space.}

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Oct 2020 21:33:34
Thanks Ed.

Yeah I don’t think any West Ham fan would take Nasri back. Haha.

{Ed002's Note -Balotelli?}

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Oct 2020 06:27:39
What had you heard Ed? Haha.

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Oct 2020 09:37:01
Any decent strikers Ed on as free agents?, thinking about it that question basically contradicts itself lol.

{Ed002's Note - I don't think West Ham are looking but there are folks like Mario Mandzukic, Mario Balotelli, Alexandre Pato and Daniel Sturridge who are looking for clubs.}

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Oct 2020 19:32:55
It's done I've seen him in the shirt ⚒.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

16 Oct 2020 20:19:24
Didn’t think it would drag on without some sort of positive outcome, well pleased as my son in law who follows Forest in the Championship, thinks Benrahma was the most exciting forward in the league last season scoring some great goals! Hope he follows it on👍👍⚒⚒⚒.

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Oct 2020 19:31:33
Claret and Hugh reporting that the loan deal is done. £4m loan fee and obligation to buy if certain requirements are fulfilled.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

16 Oct 2020 19:36:13
Confirmed on WHUFC website.

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Oct 2020 19:20:54
Now then lads, dunno if it's done or what but I've just read at 19:20 that he has signed on lan with a few to buy at the end with a fee of £25m 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

16 Oct 2020 19:20:31
I've seen one report that Benrahma deal is done, does anyone know?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

16 Oct 2020 17:28:35
Three deal sheets in with FA so two hours extensions.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

16 Oct 2020 17:05:16
I take it the deal didn't go through?

Believable1 Unbelievable0

16 Oct 2020 17:25:09
Deal sheet submitted - new deadline 7pm. Hopefully it gets finalised.

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Oct 2020 17:27:31
West Ham have put a deal sheet into the league and have until 7pm to come to an agreement?

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Oct 2020 14:41:22
Ed, have you heard that we could now be after a loan deal for Benrahma with obligation to buy?

{Ed002's Note - I am not keeping that close to the situation. However, it would not be a good way to try and do business with Brentford at this late stage.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

16 Oct 2020 15:26:52
Would it be an idea to loan Benrahma, so there would be funds still available to buy King, maybe sell Anderson or Haller next summer to then buy Benrahma if all goes well?

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Oct 2020 17:13:46
Hi stevie66 no news on BENRAHMA but KING definitely staying at AFC. COYI.

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Oct 2020 12:07:26
Benrahma has failed his medical, we could be in for King now?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

16 Oct 2020 12:27:29
I see they are re-doing the medical, would be good to hear what he failed on as could be simple and nothing to worry about.

Agree1 Disagree0

16 Oct 2020 12:41:33
Considering Kieron Dyer, Andy Carroll and Jack Wilshire all managed to pass their medicals you have to wonder how exactly Benrahma has managed to failed his.

Agree1 Disagree0

16 Oct 2020 12:52:08
He either fails or passes surely? ⚒⚒⚒.

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Oct 2020 13:02:46
I just read that it was something to do with blood work. Hopefully it gets sorted and maybe the fee can be reduced.

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Oct 2020 12:24:44
It depend what he has failed on, we did the same with Demba Ba, he was going Stoke and failed the medical, WH went in at a well reduced price and picked him up, Ed002 any update on this please.

{Ed002's Note - I am not so sure this is a big deal. There were issues with a blood test yesterday that were being looked at again - but this has come from a third party close to Brentford rather than the club itself.}

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Oct 2020 13:44:45
If this isn’t a big issue, why even mention it if they still think the deal will happen, it’s all just to add to the drama of deadline day!

{Ed002's Note - Has WHU said anything at all?}

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Oct 2020 13:58:15
Someone’s mentioned it, whether it’s West Ham or Brentford, it could’ve all been kept under raps until 5pm, but like I said, it all adds to the drama, I still think something might happen with King?

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Oct 2020 14:00:30
exactly Ed002, plus Stevie as Ed said it was a 3rd party close to Brentford, maybe he wanted to be billy big shoes and make a few quid from the tabloids who knows.

{Ed002's Note - No I spoke with him to see if I could find out what the issue is; he did not speak with the tabloids.}

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Oct 2020 17:16:40
BENRAHAMA didn't fail his medical apparently that's come from DM so you never know but a loan deal with a view to a £30million deal in the summer but still waiting for confirmation from WHUFC. COYI.

Agree0 Disagree0


Mobile version of this site: West Ham Rumours Mobile


Football Transfer Rumours


West Ham Rumours 2


West Ham Rumours 3

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass