11 Jul 2017 14:31:21
Hi fans, it's me again. 😂😂.
West Brom paid ££13m for Chadli and we paid £20,5 for Ayew. If we swap them how is this a good deal for WH. I would insist of Chadli plus £10m. After all, it's West Brom that want rid of Chadli and not us wanting to get rid of Ayew. We should play hardball here.

1.) 11 Jul 2017
11 Jul 2017 15:24:45
I'm not sure about chadli never have been.

2.) 11 Jul 2017
11 Jul 2017 15:46:14
If we could get him and 10 mill I might say go for it, but I think ayew has had one season with us and this season he would want to prove his worth and we know he can score goals.

3.) 11 Jul 2017
11 Jul 2017 18:16:09
When I first brought this up yesterday, it was never suggested That it would be a straight swap IF it were to take place, WH would want cash plus the player, THIS really depends on wether Ayew would go to WBA PERSONALLY I like. CHADLI and you have to remember WH tried to buy him two years ago, they are two different types of player so we shall see IRONMIKE.

4.) 11 Jul 2017
11 Jul 2017 18:24:49
Ayew is much better than that Tottenham reject pass on that one.

5.) 11 Jul 2017
11 Jul 2017 20:16:30
I agree Iron Al. If Tottenham wanted shot of him and WBA also want shot of him, I would suggest he's not the best player to be in a dressing room. Ther is no doubting he's a "half decent" player, but I would stick with Ayew for at least another season to see how he shapes. We want pace and we have it in Ayew.

6.) 11 Jul 2017
11 Jul 2017 20:59:09
Ayew got better as the games went on he's versatile and a intelligent player he's doesn't have the raw pace of someone like Antonio but he linked the play well and scored a few crucial goals. I like him and believe where yet to see his best in a west ham shirt that flick for feghouli's goal against Burnley was quality. Do think we're selling ourselves short on feghouli aswell.

7.) 12 Jul 2017
12 Jul 2017 12:30:36
Not a great fan of ayew but the baggies will be getting the better deal in my opinion.