08 Jun 2016 11:57:53
HI fellas, keep calm, and carry on! I told you last night to ignore the majority of these claims and counter claims on news now, I will just repeat what I said last night, AT this time there is NO bid for FEKIR, I mentioned it was WH intention to do a DOUBLE announcement TORE and HUTCHISON, fees had been agreed seperately for these two in sterling 13,75 m and 2,5 m respectively, equals approx 16,25 NOW besiktas want 19,5 m. , So WH are being forced up, and they don't like it, who would? Next PEYERYA, looks like he is on his way to ZENIT, ON TOWNSEND, at this time WH. NO bid! interested, that's all. At this time PALACE look likely for his destination, MOUSSA SISSOKO, wants to play for arsenal NOT west ham, LACAZETTE, Lyon have now set the figure out at which they will, accept WH bid which is 31m sterling nothing less, JANSEN, Is now going to be the subject of a bid from SPURS, there is NO bid but lots of interest from many clubs in CORIC, SADIO MANE looks to be beyond WH as Liverpool, are going to offer over 30m for him, There are MANY, LIVE interests, out there Pied Sidibe, Umtitti, Ntep, Nkoudou etc, OZKAYUP, remains apossibility for WH, Chelsea are against us here, BUT we already know it's becoming difficult in Turkey, BACCA is being heavily pursued by Valencia, VAN DER WIEL, is attracted by ROMA, talking of Italiian clubs it seems that two of them and man city are interested in OGBONNA and I am hearing EVERTON are interested in REID, TOULOUSE are considering BRAITHWAITE. And FEGHOULI is considering our offer Apperently He has afew suggestions on the table, WH have officially parted company with Obrien, song, eminike, jenkinson and moses, Sunderland have been told that unless they come up with at least 17m they won't be buying SAKHO, WH are talking to a couple of teams! trying to shift VALENCIA, there doesn't seem to be. Any rush to get him at the 10m WH are asking, BARCA, will be given a make your mind up scenario on UMTITTI shortly, if they decline, WH likely to come straight in on this one, that's just a day in the life if a WH supporter "" back later IRONMIKE
,

1.) 08 Jun 2016
08 Jun 2016 12:29:21
Thanks as always Mike. CORIC looks a real talent and I believe we are contemplating Â£10.5m bid for him!

2.) 08 Jun 2016
08 Jun 2016 12:45:50
Thanks IRONMIKE. Very useful info!

3.) 08 Jun 2016
08 Jun 2016 13:03:40
Thanks Iron as always, been waiting for your update all morning.

Concerning Tore and Hutchison, with them now changing the goal post by Â£3.25m than agreed, do you think in today's climate and the amount of money floating in the Premier league clubs that although we don't want to be seen as being held to ransom for other clubs to do the same, and if considering that SB wants these 2 players which it obviously seems we do, just pay the extra get the deal over the line and agree with Besiktas that the report to the media is we have signed both players for an undisclosed sum?, that why we do not seem to be bowing down to extra demands and have 2 wanted players on board. Not ideal losing a bit of face but if SB really wants them pay the club and begone, and just don't deal with them again!

Concerning Lacazette, is he worth Â£31?, if so again why don't we just pay if we want him that bad.

Obviously i'm not as clued up as you and Ed on these transfers and appreciate they are awkward, but surely the DGS would have known inflated prices would be a main factor considering how much money each prem club has got now. or will they only do a deal what right for them and have other players in mind if these do not get over the line?

{Ed002's Note - It really is not as simplas "why don't we just pay it". Clubs do not want to overspend on players.}

4.) 08 Jun 2016
08 Jun 2016 13:15:05
Lacazette is the player I believe will bet 20+ a season. I feel this is the calibre of player we need if we want to progress.

5.) 08 Jun 2016
08 Jun 2016 13:18:31
WELL saiid ED! Warrington, tell me, IF you went into a shop, and said how much is it for those two shirts, Well that will be Â£ 40 sir, OK say you, I'll have them, I'll be back in a second, YOU go back, " WELL we have thought about it, and Â£50 is now the price!, DO you say that's good, well thank you very much, OR say. Best you keep them and go elsewhere, OR negotiate, WH do no have an unlimited budget, what they spend on one transfer, CANNOt be spent on another transfer! that's it! it's not just a question of getting value for money! regards IRONMIKE.

6.) 08 Jun 2016
08 Jun 2016 13:19:06
I understand what you mean Ed, but its Â£3.25m, yes of course that's a lot of money extra than agreed, but its 2 players not 1, and sometimes if you want something that bad you just pay over the odds and move on.

Its like coming back from a night in London on the sauce and have a monthly travel card, but sometimes you get a cab as you can't be asked to wait around at night for a bus. maybe not!

{Ed002's Note - Firstly the transactions are no being dealt with as a bundle, there seems to eb some misunderstanding there. Secondly I understand that Hutchinson is agreed in principle - although I am not sure why WHU are looking at players of that age.}

7.) 08 Jun 2016
08 Jun 2016 13:42:47
Ironmike. if you went into a shop and wanted two specialised shirts that you really wanted and no one else had, but was told that the price had risen that was advertised on the shirt by 20% would you just walk away and not consider? . even though you really wanted that shirts and the price had gone up to Â£60 rather than the advertised Â£50, would you not pay a Â£10 extra to have something you wanted but not tell your mates you had to pay the extra!

Yes of course negotiate, that goes without saying, but you can't just dismiss because the price has gone up. All I was saying is if you want something that badly and the price goes up, sometimes you just pay on depending how much you want it. I am allowed my say without being patronised by you.

8.) 08 Jun 2016
08 Jun 2016 13:53:06
Thanks Ed for making that clear, yes I was on the misunderstanding that the Tore and Hutchinson deal was njow as a bundle, as in a earlier post I read, maybe my replies are mislead on my misunderstanding. apolliges for that.

{Ed002's Note - No problem WS.}

9.) 08 Jun 2016
08 Jun 2016 13:56:03
In am certainly not patronising you, sir, dealings are not anywhere near as straightforward As most people think they are, a, transfer deal has to suit both clubs, the player, his agent. Family, etc etc, WH are certainly NOT in a position to throw money about, it's only by great expedience, and financial management, that they have risen so far in such a short time, they have cut costs at every corner, done a fantastic deal on the stadium and it's running costs, they are NOT going to put this to the sword over one transfer, and then that will show the way for everybody else to jump on the bandwagon, and start gazumping, that's it regards to you IRONMIKE.

10.) 08 Jun 2016
08 Jun 2016 14:16:47
Thanks for the reply Iron mike, maybe misread the interpretation of wording,