19 Mar 2016 18:15:54
We have apparently agreed 11m euro deal for Gorkan tore and are working to sign lacazette and perez. Not sure where that will leave valencia and carroll.

{Ed002's Note - As I explained earlier, there has been no agreement for Gokhan Tore at this time.

An enquiry has been made by WHU regarding the availability of Lacazette with Lyon - but that is all at this time - there is nothing being "worked on". However, it is known that Lacazette wants English money and, critically, Champions League. However, if WHU were to qualify and they were willing to pay the increased price that Lyon want from an English club then something may well be possible in the summer.

As for Perez I assume you are referring to Newcastle's Ayoze Perez who has been watched by Sevilla, Spurs, Valencia and Atletico with Sevilla looking to open negotiations for a summer move. Newcastle have declined discussions about sales until the end of the season when they will know where they stand. West Ham have not shown any interest in him and are not "working to sign" him. If it is another Perez then I apologize.}

1.) 19 Mar 2016
19 Mar 2016 22:54:38
I would love us to tore he can replace on loan moses, we need a cm to replace song, we may have that in nordtveit.
First thing first get lanzini deal done. Then hopefully a top striker, don't believe we should sign perez, hopefully lacazette, I would let valencia go if we can get a good price.

2.) 20 Mar 2016
20 Mar 2016 13:48:13
I'd be happy to let Valencia and Carroll go if the money offered was right.

I don't think Song or Moses have done enough to merit a permanent transfer.

Nordveit is a good replacement for Song, Tore would be a great replacement for Moses. If we sell both Valencia and Carroll, I would want two more additions, Lacazette would be great but not sufficient if we lose both Valencia and Carroll (in my opinion) .

3.) 20 Mar 2016
20 Mar 2016 17:01:58
I would like us to keep Carroll, I think he gives us a plan B, I would use him as last 20 mins sub to make an impact and he may keep fit being used this way. On his day he's a handful and give defenders a nightmare. The longer he's fit the better he'll become.

4.) 20 Mar 2016
20 Mar 2016 18:59:11
I agree with irontodd. I would keep Carroll if possible as an impact sub. He can make a difference coming off the bench as we've seen in recent weeks. Only problem would be could we afford to keep such a high earner for just coming off the bench.

5.) 20 Mar 2016
20 Mar 2016 20:03:59
I would keep carrol and Valencia if we have European football next season we will need a bigger squad âš’.

6.) 21 Mar 2016
21 Mar 2016 09:39:43
I'd let valencia go anyway he doesn't offer enough for me apart from falling over a lot his goal record is terrible aswell the only thing that's good is he can play wide or upfront so he's OK for cover.

7.) 21 Mar 2016
21 Mar 2016 12:32:45
If we have to sell to sign gokhan tore then in my opinion it has to valencia.

8.) 21 Mar 2016
21 Mar 2016 12:52:22
Good riddance to Valencia me thinks. Would prefer Tore any day.

9.) 30 Mar 2016
30 Mar 2016 20:34:43
Rather Carroll left over Valencia pace over power any day both are injury prone but billic prefers Valencia over Carroll if we could get 10-15 mill for Carroll we'd be laughing lacazette for 25 mill happy days tore to follow COYI.